top of page

Data Annotation Service

10 Real-World Case Studies: Lessons from 3D Point Cloud Annotation Projects

Explore 10 real-world case studies of 3D point cloud annotation projects across industries. Discover proven strategies and expert insights.

12

min

Mahmoud_edited.jpg

Admon W.

Introduction

1. Autonomous Vehicle Perception Systems

2. Smart Highway Perception Systems

3. Forest Resource 3D Modeling

4. Factory AGV Indoor Navigation and Localization

5. Scene Mapping for Robot Navigation

6. Terrain Analysis in Mining Operations

7. Indoor Scene Understanding and Object Recognition

8. Defect Detection in Industrial Vision Inspection

9. Goods Recognition and Localization in Unmanned Warehouses

10. Automated Container Yard Management in Ports

BONUS: BasicAI's Professional Data Annotation Services Supporting 3D Annotation Project Success


 

Introduction

When LiDAR technology was first used to measure the lunar surface topography, few could have imagined how it would transform our lives half a century later. Today, point cloud processing technology has permeated various aspects of our daily lives – from autonomous vehicles to robotic vacuum cleaners, from industrial quality inspection to smart cities – quietly reshaping our world.

However, processing and utilizing point cloud data presents unique challenges. Unlike images, point cloud data consists of discrete, irregular three-dimensional spatial information, making annotation and processing particularly complex.

Our team has conducted extensive research and interviews to compile experiences from 10 real-world cases across different industries. Each case study is based on actual project experience, detailing key information such as hardware specifications, technical challenges, and annotation requirements.

By sharing these cases, we aim to provide valuable insights for teams currently working on or planning point cloud-related projects, helping them better understand resource requirements, potential challenges, and possible solutions to increase project success rates.

1. Autonomous Vehicle Perception Systems

Most autonomous vehicles typically employ 32-channel or 64-channel LiDARs as their core sensors, operating at 10-20Hz. In real-world road scenarios, single-frame point clouds often suffer from severe occlusion and sparsity issues, particularly for distant objects in high-speed conditions where the point cloud might contain as few as dozens of points. The industry typically addresses this by fusing multiple frame sequences to enhance perception, which introduces new challenges for annotation.

Autonomous Vehicle. Photo by Timo Wielink on Unsplash

Motion compensation is the first major hurdle in achieving high-precision object detection and tracking. During registration, we typically merge 3-5 frame sequences, being careful to exclude moving objects from the registration process. Dynamic feature extraction is equally crucial – leveraging motion continuity characteristics can significantly improve detection accuracy.

Annotation team training typically requires 2-3 months, an investment that proves worthwhile. The core focus in data annotation is ensuring high-quality 3D labeling. Dynamic object 3D bounding box (3D cuboid) annotation demands exceptional frame-to-frame consistency, with size fluctuation between frames being a common pitfall. For large vehicles, changes in pitch angle directly affect box accuracy.

In object tracking annotation, besides maintaining ID consistency, detailed occlusion states must be recorded. Interestingly, even completely occluded objects need reasonable annotation predictions based on contextual information, demanding high expertise from annotation teams.

The most commonly overlooked aspect is data collection. While collection routes must cover various typical scenarios, sensor calibration is even more critical. We once encountered a case where detection performance in high-speed scenarios was compromised due to subtle multi-sensor timing synchronization errors.

For initial algorithm development, we recommend starting with proven open-source models to quickly establish a baseline. However, deployment optimization is often the most challenging phase, requiring algorithm optimization while maintaining performance.

Experience shows it's best to collect data under various weather conditions, with rainy and foggy weather data being particularly valuable. Highly reflective materials, such as glass curtain walls, remain a persistent challenge requiring special algorithmic handling.

Required Annotation Types

Approximate Timeline

3D bounding box annotation (with orientation) / 3D object tracking annotation (with ID continuity) / 3D polyline annotation (lane lines) / Point cloud segmentation (ground, buildings, and other background)

6-8 months (Data collection: 1 month, Annotation team training: 2 months, Data annotation: 2-3 months, Algorithm development: 2 months, Deployment optimization: 1 month – Some phases can run in parallel)

2. Smart Highway Perception Systems

High-resolution LiDARs with 128 channels or more, such as Ouster OS1-128 or Velodyne Alpha Prime, have become standard equipment at critical locations like toll stations and highway ramps, offering scanning rates up to 20Hz. These fixed-mount LiDARs differ significantly from vehicle-mounted systems in terms of data stability, typically covering monitoring ranges of 200-300 feet (reaching up to 400 feet under ideal conditions). This stationary deployment enables algorithmic strategies that would be impractical in mobile scenarios.

Highway. Photo by RyanMcGuire on Pixabay

The stability of background point clouds in fixed scenes offers significant advantages. While we can build precise background models that are invaluable for dynamic object extraction, the real challenge lies in handling occlusions, particularly when large vehicles block other targets. Historical trajectory information effectively resolves short-term occlusions, but long-duration occlusions require more sophisticated handling mechanisms.

Data annotation extends beyond basic zone segmentation to include precise labeling of lane functionality. Dynamic object annotation must capture not only position but also vehicle classification. Interestingly, vehicle trajectory annotation, though often undervalued, proves crucial for subsequent behavior analysis and prediction. We've found that detailed trajectory annotation significantly improves anomaly detection accuracy.

Sensor placement often determines system performance ceiling. LiDAR installation angles of 15-20 degrees typically work best. Real-world deployments frequently encounter blind spots caused by large vehicles, often requiring multiple coordinated LiDARs. Given the 24/7 operational requirements, algorithms must be environmentally adaptive.

A client's valuable insight:

"Regular sensor lens cleaning, at least 1-2 times monthly, is essential. Raw data should be retained for 3-7 days minimum for issue tracking and system optimization."

Required Annotation Types

Approximate Timeline

3D zone annotation (polygons) / 3D bounding box annotation (with vehicle classification) / 3D trajectory annotation / Ground and background point cloud segmentation

4-5 months (Field deployment and calibration: 1 month, Data collection and annotation: 2 months, Algorithm development: 1 month, System optimization and stability testing: 1 month)

3. Forest Resource 3D Modeling

Aerial forest surveys typically employ high-altitude LiDAR systems like Riegl VUX-1UAV or Teledyne Optech mounted on small fixed-wing aircraft or helicopters, achieving point densities of 2-8 points/ft² (reaching up to 15 points/ft² during low-altitude flights). This aerial laser scanning technology penetrates forest canopies to capture ground and multi-layer vegetation structure, ideal for large-scale forest inventory.

Forest Resource. Photo by aszak on Pixabay.

The key to forest point cloud processing lies in layering. Accurate Digital Terrain Model (DTM) extraction from dense point clouds forms the foundation for all subsequent analysis. Traditional slope-based ground point extraction algorithms often fail in steep terrain. Incorporating local curvature features significantly improves accuracy. Tree identification follows a bottom-up approach, reconstructing entire tree structures from trunk bases. Crown overlap presents the greatest challenge, requiring consideration of species characteristics and growth patterns.

Forestry data annotation requires specialized knowledge. Each tree needs labeling for position, height, DBH (Diameter at Breast Height), and species-specific crown characteristics. Annotators must understand seasonal growth patterns as these affect point cloud density distribution. Coniferous forests, with their regular crown shapes, are relatively straightforward to annotate, while deciduous mixed forests often require more manual intervention due to lower crown segmentation accuracy.

Data collection flights should be scheduled during optimal seasonal conditions, typically pre-leaf fall or post-leaf emergence in clear weather. Point clouds from different seasons complement each other – winter data better reveals trunk structure, while summer data is optimal for biomass parameters. Mountain forest regions require particular attention to DTM accuracy, as it directly affects tree parameter measurements. Crown shape irregularity analysis can help identify endangered or diseased trees.

Required Annotation Types

Approximate Timeline

Crown boundary annotation (polygons) / Height and DBH annotation / Species classification annotation

3-4 months (Flight data collection: 2-3 weeks, Data processing: 1 month, Annotation work: 1 month, Algorithm development and validation: 1-1.5 months)

4. Factory AGV Indoor Navigation and Localization

Factory AGV navigation systems typically employ cost-effective 16-channel or 32-channel LiDARs mounted on AGV tops. Unlike outdoor scenarios, factory environments feature level floors but complex structures including metallic equipment and shelving, presenting unique challenges for SLAM mapping and real-time localization.

Factory. Photo by Foto-Rabe on Pixabay

The primary technical challenge in indoor navigation is handling dynamic environments. Frequent movement of personnel, forklifts, and other AGVs causes continuous changes in laser scan data. We've found that traditional ICP registration algorithms tend to drift in such scenarios. Extracting geometric features like wall corners and pillars as fixed reference points significantly improves localization stability. Interestingly, metal surface reflections, often considered problematic, can actually aid localization due to their predictable patterns.

Annotation work focuses on both static and dynamic elements. Static structure annotation requires precise position and dimension labeling of walls and shelving units for prior map construction. Dynamic obstacle annotation emphasizes motion trajectories and velocity characteristics. An often-overlooked detail is the annotation of special zones like charging stations and loading areas, which typically have specific operational rules.

During implementation, AGVs need to complete multiple facility-wide tours, collecting data across different time periods to cover various operational conditions. System robustness takes priority over absolute precision. LiDAR mounting height may slightly vary under different load conditions due to suspension system deformation, requiring special consideration during calibration. The testing phase works best with a progressive, zone-by-zone approach, starting with simple areas before advancing to more complex ones.

Required Annotation Types

Approximate Timeline

Structured annotation of static scenes (walls, pillars) / Dynamic obstacle trajectory annotation / Functional zone annotation (polygons) / Navigation path annotation

3-4 months (Site survey and data collection: 2 weeks, Mapping and annotation: 1 month, Algorithm development: 1.5 months, On-site debugging and optimization: 1 month)

5. Scene Mapping for Robot Navigation

Service robots typically employ cost-effective single-channel or 16-channel LiDARs. While these sensors have fewer channels, they can build comprehensive environment maps through robot movement. These sensors offer higher scanning frequencies of 30-40Hz, particularly beneficial for real-time indoor obstacle avoidance. Traditional SLAM algorithms perform well in structured indoor environments but face significant challenges in complex dynamic settings.

Robot Navigation. Photo by Lukas on Unsplash.

The biggest technical challenge lies in handling sensor data uncertainty. Glass and mirror surfaces cause inaccurate distance measurements, while soft materials like carpets absorb laser energy, resulting in no effective returns. Multi-sensor fusion is crucial as a foundational architecture. Robot turning motions often cause map stitching discontinuities, requiring compensation algorithms for correction.

Annotation primarily focuses on traversable areas and obstacles. Mixed environments require labeling of floors, walls, furniture, and variable structures like doors and elevators. A commonly overlooked detail is dynamic scene annotation, such as automatic door states and movable furniture positions. Our experience shows that annotators must pay special attention to wheelchair ramps and floor irregularities that affect robot passage.

Additionally, lighting changes significantly impact LiDAR performance, especially near sun-exposed glass walls. Repeated robot paths can deform carpets, necessitating dynamic map update mechanisms. Air conditioning airflow can affect laser ranging stability, particularly in environments with fine particles.

Required Annotation Types

Approximate Timeline

3D scene semantic annotation (walls, doors) / Dynamic area annotation / Special zone annotation (e.g., charging stations)

2-3 months (Scene collection: 1 week, Data processing and annotation: 2 weeks, Algorithm development: 1 month, Field debugging: 1 month)

6. Terrain Analysis in Mining Operations

Mining environments typically use high-precision ground-based fixed LiDARs capable of measuring thousands of feet with 0.04-0.12 inch accuracy. Open-pit mines often require multiple elevated scanning stations for complete site coverage through multi-station registration. These data serve both volume measurement and slope stability monitoring purposes.

Change detection forms the core of mining point cloud processing. Comparing scans from different periods enables precise calculation of mining progress and earthwork volumes. Triangular mesh models better reconstruct complex terrain, especially for cliff-like slopes. Slope creep detection is crucial – even 0.04-0.08 inch displacements can indicate potential landslide risks. Point cloud registration-based deformation monitoring algorithms achieve 0.02 inch change detection accuracy.

Terrain Analysis. Photo by Chris on Unsplash.

Annotation becomes particularly critical with massive mining point clouds. Different rock zones, structural planes, and fault zones must be labeled, directly impacting slope stability analysis accuracy. Surprisingly, experienced geological engineers can identify different lithological features from point cloud intensity data.

In practice, lighting variations and dust significantly affect scan quality, making early morning or evening operations preferable. Seasonal vegetation changes interfere with terrain analysis, requiring specialized vegetation filtering algorithms. Fresh blast faces show distinctly different reflection characteristics compared to weathered surfaces, useful for identifying new mining areas. Multi-temporal data fusion helps complement areas obscured by large machinery.

Required Annotation Types

Approximate Timeline

Geological structure annotation (faults, joints) / Risk zone annotation (displacement monitoring areas)

4-6 months (Station network planning: 2 weeks, Data collection: 1 month, Processing and analysis: 2 months, System deployment: 1-2 months)

7. Indoor Scene Understanding and Object Recognition

Indoor scene understanding applications typically employ cost-effective 16-channel or single-channel LiDARs mounted on mobile robots, operating at 10-20Hz with scanning ranges of 15-65 feet. Complete 3D indoor maps are built through robot movement, enabling scene understanding and object recognition.

Indoor Scene. Photo by tianya1223 on Pixabay.

The primary data processing challenge lies in handling dynamic and complex environments. While fixed objects like furniture and walls are easily identifiable, frequently moved items like chairs require dynamic map updates. Glass and mirror surfaces create reflection or penetration issues requiring specialized algorithms. Floor variations like carpets and thresholds need accurate identification for safe robot navigation.

Object recognition challenges center on feature extraction from point clouds. Furniture geometric features (like cylindrical table legs or rectangular sofa outlines) serve as key identification markers. Recognition accuracy improves by analyzing spatial relationships and typical placement patterns – for instance, the typical arrangement of chairs around dining tables provides valuable contextual information.

Point cloud density decreases with distance, reducing distant object recognition accuracy. Multi-angle scanning by robots can supplement data and improve recognition reliability. While LiDAR is relatively insensitive to lighting changes, occlusion presents significant challenges, especially in furniture-dense areas. Low-clearance spaces like under beds and sofas require special consideration due to sparse point cloud data.

Required Annotation Types

Approximate Timeline

Object annotation (3D cuboids) / Polygon annotation (traversable areas) / Obstacle type annotation

2-3 months (Data collection: 2 weeks, Annotation work: 3 weeks, Algorithm development: 1 month, Optimization and debugging: 2 weeks)

8. Defect Detection in Industrial Vision Inspection

Industrial inspection applications typically use high-precision line laser scanners. These devices achieve micron-level scanning accuracy but cover smaller ranges. While this high-precision scanning might seem straightforward, achieving reliable defect detection in industrial production lines presents numerous challenges.

Defect Detection. Photo by Minku Kang on Unsplash.

Surface defect detection critically depends on handling different material reflection properties. Metal parts create mirror reflections causing data loss, while matte surfaces produce diffusion. Scanning parameters can be optimized for different materials by adjusting laser power and exposure time. Some surface defects are more visible from specific angles, inspiring multi-angle adaptive scanning strategy development. Combining traditional grayscale image processing with 3D point cloud analysis significantly enhances detection effectiveness.

Annotation challenges stem from defect diversity. Different defect types – scratches, dents, bubbles – require varied annotation methods, with some defects only confirmable under microscopic imaging. Annotation requires detailed defect grading standards incorporating dimensions like depth, area, and shape. Some surface flaws appear more prominent in point cloud data than physical inspection, providing robust features for automated detection.

In production environments, vibration and temperature variations significantly impact detection precision. Workpiece temperature changes require compensation, and equipment needs periodic recalibration. Dust particles can trigger false defect detections, driving the development of more intelligent feature classification algorithms. Scanning systems must match production line speeds through real-time processing pipelines to maintain inspection efficiency.

Required Annotation Types

Approximate Timeline

Defect contour annotation (2D/3D) / Segmentation annotation / Defect type annotation (grading and classification)

3-4 months (Sample collection: 1 month, Annotation work: 1 month, Algorithm development: 1 month, Production line debugging: 1 month)

9. Goods Recognition and Localization in Unmanned Warehouses

Unmanned warehouse systems combine multi-line LiDARs with structured light cameras. Shelf areas use 16 or 32-channel medium-range LiDARs for AGV navigation and bulk cargo detection, while picking stations employ high-precision structured light cameras for ±0.4 inch positioning accuracy. Though costly, this dual-system approach significantly enhances reliability.

Goods Recognition. Photo by icondigital on Pixabay.

The main challenge in goods recognition lies in handling variable packaging forms. Cardboard boxes deform under stacking pressure, plastic packaging creates reflections, and flexible packaging has unpredictable shapes. Adaptive feature extraction algorithms often combine geometric features with reflection intensity data. Box creases and labels serve as crucial feature points for determining orientation, vital for grasp planning.

Stack scenarios present the greatest annotation challenges. Beyond individual item position and pose, annotations must include stacking relationships and support surface areas. A frequently overlooked detail is inter-item spacing, crucial for grasp path planning. Annotation teams must particularly note deformation as this directly influences grasp strategy selection.

Implementation begins with establishing a goods database, collecting point cloud data of various items in different poses and stacking configurations. Interestingly, recognition difficulty varies significantly by location – stacking areas proves more challenging than picking stations. Algorithm development must handle partial occlusions, achieving recognition through partial feature matching against a geometric feature library.

Practical implementation revealed that ambient light significantly affects structured light camera performance, requiring light shields in critical work areas. The material database needs regular updates as new product packaging may differ completely. Box shapes change with humidity, demanding robust algorithmic tolerance.

Required Annotation Types

Approximate Timeline

3D bounding box annotation / Point cloud segmentation / Support surface annotation

4-5 months (Sample collection: 1 month, Annotation work: 1.5 months, Algorithm development: 1.5 months, System integration: 1 month)

10. Automated Container Yard Management in Ports

Port yard management systems typically employ multi-level sensor solutions. Long-range 64 or 128-channel LiDARs cover yard areas for broad container positioning and stack monitoring, while 32-channel medium-range LiDARs on gantry cranes enable precise operation guidance. This multi-tier monitoring network balances broad coverage with local precision.

Ports. Photo by cegoh on Pixabay.

Technical challenges manifest in two aspects: handling large-scale dense stacking scenes where container occlusion and reflection cause partial point cloud loss, and managing adverse weather conditions where rain and fog significantly affect LiDAR detection range. Probability-based multi-sensor fusion algorithms enhance system reliability, while container edge features enable precise positioning.

Annotation requirements include container position and orientation, container number regions, loading/unloading positions, and safe operation zones. Stack relationship annotation proves particularly crucial for automated equipment operation planning. Container deformation annotation, often overlooked, directly impacts automated gripping.

In practice, coastal environments demand robust equipment. Salt spray corrosion and temperature variations affect LiDAR performance, requiring special protection measures and regular maintenance. Day-night temperature differences cause slight steel structure deformation, affecting positioning accuracy and requiring temperature-compensated point cloud registration. Special filtering algorithms handle mirror reflections from water-covered container surfaces.

Required Annotation Types

Approximate Timeline

Container bounding box annotation (including stack levels) / Operation zone annotation (polygons) / Safety corridor annotation / Loading/unloading position annotation / Deformation detection zone annotation

5-6 months (Yard planning: 1 month, Equipment deployment: 1 month, Data collection and annotation: 1.5 months, Algorithm development: 1.5 months, System integration: 1 month)

BONUS: BasicAI's Professional Data Annotation Services Supporting 3D Annotation Project Success

The 10 cases above demonstrate that high-quality point cloud data annotation is crucial for project success while presenting numerous challenges. Annotation work requires not only professional technical knowledge but also deep understanding of specific application scenarios. We observe that annotation typically consumes 25-30% of total project duration, demanding significant human resources and time.

In practice, more companies are choosing to outsource data annotation to professional service providers. This not only reduces project costs but, more importantly, ensures annotation quality and efficiency.

BasicAI possesses rich experience in point cloud data annotation, having provided professional annotation services to clients across autonomous driving, intelligent manufacturing, smart agriculture, and other sectors. Our self-developed 3D point cloud platform incorporates AI assistance, significantly improving annotation efficiency. Combined with our experienced full-time annotation team and strict quality control system, we consistently deliver annotation results with over 99% accuracy.

We understand the importance of data security and implement strict confidentiality measures for client data. We offer free trial annotation services, allowing clients to fully evaluate our service quality. After project completion, we provide ongoing annotation optimization and modification support to ensure results fully meet client requirements.

If you're seeking a reliable point cloud data annotation partner, we welcome you to contact us for consultation and free trial annotation. Let's discuss how professional data annotation services can help your project achieve goals faster and better.



Get Project Estimates
Get a Quote Today

Get Essential Training Data
for Your AI Model Today.

bottom of page